The NY Times reports (again) that women are doing better academically than men on college campuses. But how this will impact these womens' future places in the workforce reamins to be seen. The article concludes:
Still, men in the work force have always done better in pay and promotions, in part because they tend to work longer hours, and have fewer career interruptions than women, who bear the children and most of the responsibility for raising them.
Whether the male advantage will persist even as women's academic achievement soars is an open question. But many young men believe that, once in the work world, they will prevail.
"I think men do better out in the world because they care more about the power, the status, the C.E.O. job," Mr. Kohn said. "And maybe society holds men a little higher."
The woman with the high GPA might get the better job, but as soon as she decides to take time off to raise her kids, things are going to change. To an employer, men are more dependable in the work force. College performance isn't going to change that.
Though, there was a really interesting article in the Times magazine a while ago, which basically concluded that women aren't ruling the world because they've chosen not to.
It's hard to tell what's causing what.
Posted by: Eli7 | July 13, 2006 at 05:40 AM
How this will impact their future place in the workforce surely depends on basic structural accomadations like if there are children (a) parental leave- i.e. leave for either parent (b) genuine co-parenting i.e. both parents spend time caregiving (c) genuine sharing of domestic labor (still bizarrely imbalanced)(d) enforcement of equal pay... to mention a few. I don't buy the will-to-power difference...
Posted by: Frumella | August 13, 2006 at 08:12 AM
How this will impact their future place in the workforce surely depends on basic structural accomadations like if there are children (a) parental leave- i.e. leave for either parent (b) genuine co-parenting i.e. both parents spend time caregiving (c) genuine sharing of domestic labor (still bizarrely imbalanced)(d) enforcement of equal pay... to mention a few. I don't buy the will-to-power difference...
Posted by: Frumella | August 13, 2006 at 08:12 AM
Last night's panel discussion, nicely moderated by Kimberly Oliver and featuring Paul Rowan, Mary McBride, Aric Chen, Carl Alviani, and Jason Miller, was a fun and affectionate evening hosted at Sublime and attended by some usual and some unusual suspects. The theme was potent enough and the panelists did their best to tackle the premise but the whole question of what "American Design" is (or should be, or might be) is a slippery beast for sure. The most interesting bits revealed themselves when panelists...
Posted by: http://www.onlinemarketingmaverick.com | March 28, 2008 at 01:10 PM
As a male college student, I can tell you that I have a very poor GPA compared to my female counterparts. Why is this? For one, I devote the vast majority of time to studying Torah and Gemarah; I am also going for smicha. The second; women are good at following orders and taking notes. They are on time when guys are not- and they write down every word the teacher says when guys do not. When it comes to the real thing though, there is no question for me who would do better in serious professions (i.e. not psychology). The third reason is that many courses in college such as sociology, psychology, art, art history, music, drama, philosophy- the humanities in general, are not serious courses- courses that only women can "appreciate".
Posted by: Josh S, | May 25, 2010 at 03:50 PM
Well don't know whats going on but its not a Good way to do this. in my opinion we have to look again about this issue
Posted by: company logo design | July 15, 2010 at 01:14 PM